Single-Photon Detectors (SPADs)
Room-temperature quantum herald measurements: single-photon generation verification, path entanglement, Hong-Ou-Mandel dip visibility. Si SPAD + InGaAs SPAD for 1550 nm telecom operation.
Excelitas SPCM / ID Quantique id230 CRITICAL ● Single-photon detection validates quantum coherence and entanglement on-chipRole in QLT Fabrication
Single-photon avalanche diodes (SPADs) are the eyes of QLT's quantum photonic processor. Every quantum metric — g²(0) autocorrelation proving single-photon emission, Hong-Ou-Mandel (HOM) dip visibility proving photon indistinguishability, coincidence rates proving entanglement, and heralding efficiency proving source quality — depends on detecting individual photons with picosecond timing resolution at room temperature.
QLT's architecture requires two complementary detector technologies: silicon SPADs for visible-wavelength herald detection (from SPDC pump at 775 nm) and InGaAs/InP SPADs for telecom C-band (1550 nm) signal detection. Together with a time-to-digital converter (TDC), these detectors form the quantum characterization backbone that validates every fabrication step from waveguide loss measurement through final system-level boson sampling demonstrations.
- g²(0) autocorrelation ● proves non-classical light: g²(0) < 0.5 confirms single-photon emission
- HOM dip visibility ● measures photon indistinguishability: target V > 90%
- Coincidence counting ● verifies entanglement and multi-photon interference
- Heralding efficiency ● validates source brightness and coupling quality
- Photon count rate ● measures quantum channel throughput (~10⁵–10⁶ counts/s)
- SPAD timing jitter ● characterizes detector timing resolution (< 100 ps FWHM)
Key Quantum Measurements Enabled
| Measurement | Detectors Used | Channels | Success Criterion |
|---|---|---|---|
| g²(0) autocorrelation | 2 × InGaAs SPAD (HBT setup) | 2 (start + stop) | g²(0) < 0.5 → non-classical |
| HOM dip | 2 × InGaAs SPAD at BS outputs | 2–4 | Visibility > 90% |
| Photon count rate | 1 × SPAD per channel | 1–8 | ~10⁵–10⁶ counts/s |
| Heralded single-photon | 1 × Si SPAD (herald) + 1 × InGaAs (signal) | 2 | Herald-conditioned g²(0) < 0.1 |
| Multi-photon coincidence | 4–8 × InGaAs SPAD | 4–8 | N-fold rate matches theory |
| Dead-time characterization | 1 × SPAD + TDC | 1 | Dead time ≈ 20–50 ns |
Technical Specifications
Silicon SPAD (Visible / Herald Channel)
| Parameter | Excelitas SPCM-AQRH | MPD PDM Series |
|---|---|---|
| Spectral range | 400–1060 nm | 400–900 nm |
| Peak PDE | > 70% @ 700 nm | > 49% @ 550 nm |
| Dark count rate | < 25 counts/s (typical) | < 25 counts/s (50 μm) |
| Timing jitter | 350 ps FWHM | 35 ps FWHM (20 μm) |
| Dead time | 22 ns | 77 ns |
| Max count rate | ~35 Mcounts/s | ~13 Mcounts/s |
| After-pulse probability | < 0.5% | < 1% |
| Active area | 180 μm diameter | 20, 50, or 100 μm |
| Output | TTL pulse (4.2 V, 25 ns) | NIM or TTL |
| Cooling | Internal TEC (passive) | Internal TEC |
| Fiber input | FC connector (multimode) | FC/PC (SM optional) |
InGaAs/InP SPAD (Telecom C-Band / 1550 nm)
| Parameter | ID Quantique id230 | ID Quantique id Qube NIR | MPD InGaAs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spectral range | 900–1700 nm | 900–1700 nm | 900–1700 nm |
| PDE @ 1550 nm | 25% (free-running) | 25% (gated/free-run) | 20–30% (gated) |
| Dark count rate | < 2 kHz @ 25% PDE | < 1 kHz | ~5 kHz |
| Timing jitter | ~200 ps FWHM | ~250 ps FWHM | ~200 ps FWHM |
| Dead time | 1–25 μs (adjustable) | ~20 μs | 5–50 μs |
| Operating mode | Free-running or gated | Free-running | Gated |
| Cooling | Internal TEC to -90°C | TEC cooled | TEC cooled |
| Output | TTL / NIM | TTL (0–3.3 V) | NIM (-0.8 V) |
| After-pulse | < 3% @ 10 μs dead | < 5% | < 5% |
| Fiber input | FC/PC or FC/APC (SM) | FC/PC (SM) | FC/PC (SM) |
System Timing Resolution
TIMING BUDGET — SPAD + TDC System:
Source of uncertainty │ Value │ Bottleneck?
──────────────────────────────┼────────────────────┼───────────
TDC digital resolution │ 1 ps │ No
TDC RMS jitter │ 34 ps │ No
TDC FWHM jitter │ 80 ps │ No
Si SPAD jitter (Excelitas) │ 350 ps FWHM │ YES — herald
Si SPAD jitter (MPD 20μm) │ 35 ps FWHM │ No
InGaAs SPAD jitter (id230) │ 200 ps FWHM │ YES — signal
──────────────────────────────┼────────────────────┼───────────
System timing (herald path) │ √(80² + 350²) │ ≈ 359 ps FWHM
System timing (signal path) │ √(80² + 200²) │ ≈ 215 ps FWHM
Coincidence window (HOM) │ 1–10 ns │ Adequate ✓
NOISE EQUIVALENT POWER (Si SPAD):
NEP = (hν / PDE) × √(2 × DCR)
= (2.84e-19 / 0.70) × √(2 × 25)
≈ 2.9 × 10⁻¹⁸ W/√Hz → excellent
Process Integration
QLT QUANTUM TEST LAB ● SPAD Detector Setup (Step 07):
CONFIGURATION A: Heralded Single-Photon Characterization
├── SPDC source (ppKTP, 775 nm pump)
│ ├── Signal (1550 nm) → fiber → chip input
│ └── Idler (775 nm herald) → fiber → Si SPAD (Excelitas)
├── Chip output → fiber → InGaAs SPAD (id230)
├── Both SPADs → SMA cables → Time Tagger 20 (TDC)
├── TDC → USB → Python (TimeTagger API)
│
├── Measurement 1: Count rate (singles on each channel)
├── Measurement 2: Coincidence rate (herald-signal pairs)
├── Measurement 3: g²(0) (Hanbury-Brown-Twiss correlation)
└── Measurement 4: Heralding efficiency = coincidence/herald
CONFIGURATION B: Hong-Ou-Mandel Dip
├── Two indistinguishable photons → two chip inputs
├── On-chip beam splitter (MZI)
├── Two outputs → 2 × InGaAs SPAD (id230)
├── Both SPADs → TDC channels 1 & 2
├── Scan: optical delay between input photons
├── Record: coincidence rate vs. delay
└── Result: HOM dip → visibility V = (R_max - R_min)/R_max
Target: V > 90% (proves photon indistinguishability)
CONFIGURATION C: Boson Sampling Verification
├── 4–8 photons into mesh (from multiplexed source)
├── 8 mesh outputs → 8 × InGaAs SPAD
├── All 8 SPADs → TDC (8 channels)
├── Record: all multi-fold coincidence combinations
├── Compare: measured vs. permanent matrix theory
└── Result: validates quantum computational advantage
Vendor Options & Pricing
Silicon SPAD Modules (Visible / Herald)
| Model | Vendor | Key Spec | Price (2025–2026) | Lead Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPCM-AQRH-1x | Excelitas Technologies | > 70% PDE, 25 cps DCR, 350 ps jitter | $3,500–$5,000 | 4–6 weeks |
| PDM Series (50 μm) | Micro Photon Devices | 49% PDE, 25 cps DCR, 35 ps jitter | $8,000–$12,000 | 6–8 weeks |
| τ-SPAD | PicoQuant | ~70% PDE, < 100 cps DCR | $4,000–$7,000 | 4–8 weeks |
| COUNT Series | Laser Components | ~65% PDE, < 50 cps DCR | $3,000–$5,000 | 4–6 weeks |
InGaAs SPAD Modules (1550 nm / Signal)
| Model | Vendor | Key Spec | Price (2025–2026) | Lead Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| id230 | ID Quantique | 25% PDE, 2 kHz DCR, free-running | $15,000–$25,000 | 4–8 weeks |
| id Qube NIR | ID Quantique | 25% PDE, 1 kHz DCR, compact | $8,000–$12,000 | 4–6 weeks |
| InGaAs SPAD | Micro Photon Devices | 20–30% PDE, gated mode | $10,000–$18,000 | 6–10 weeks |
| NIR SPAD Module | Aurea Technology | 25% PDE, free-running | $12,000–$20,000 | 6–8 weeks |
SNSPD Upgrade Path (Future)
| Model | Vendor | Key Spec | Price | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eos Series | Single Quantum | > 90% PDE, < 10 cps DCR, 15 ps jitter | $150,000–$300,000 | Includes cryo-cooler; 4-channel |
| Photon Spot | Photon Spot Inc. | > 85% PDE, < 100 cps DCR | $100,000–$200,000 | Compact cryo-system; fiber-coupled |
| SNSPD System | Quantum Opus | > 80% PDE, fiber-coupled | $120,000–$250,000 | Closed-cycle cryo; 2.1 K operation |
Total System Budget
QLT SINGLE-PHOTON DETECTOR LAB: Herald channel (visible): ├── 2 × Excelitas SPCM-AQRH $7,000–$10,000 ├── 2 × MPD PDM (low-jitter option) $16,000–$24,000 Signal channel (1550 nm): ├── 4 × ID Quantique id Qube NIR $32,000–$48,000 ├── 4 × ID Quantique id230 $60,000–$100,000 Time-to-digital converter: ├── Swabian Time Tagger 20 (8 ch) $8,000–$10,000 Accessories: ├── FC/PC fiber patch cords (×16) $800 ├── SMA cables 50Ω (×8) $200 ├── Optical attenuators (×4) $400 ├── BNC/SMA adapters $100 ═══════════════════════════════════════════ MINIMUM CONFIG (4-ch InGaAs + 2-ch Si): $55,000–$80,000 FULL 8-CHANNEL CONFIG: $120,000–$200,000 WITH SNSPD UPGRADE (Phase 3): $1,000,000–$2,000,000 ═══════════════════════════════════════════
Facility Requirements
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Optical table | Vibration-isolated (Newport or TMC), 1.2 × 2.4 m minimum |
| Dark enclosure | Light-tight box or curtained area (ambient light → false counts) |
| Power (SPAD modules) | 100–240 VAC, 50/60 Hz, < 100 W total (internal TEC) |
| Power (TDC) | USB-powered (5 V, 500 mA) — no external supply |
| Temperature | 20–25°C (SPAD dark counts increase with temperature) |
| Humidity | < 60% RH (prevent condensation on TEC-cooled detectors) |
| EMI | Keep away from high-power switching supplies; shielded cables |
| Floor space | ~4 m² (optical table + detector rack) |
| Fiber infrastructure | SM fiber (SMF-28e+) patch panels; FC/PC connectors throughout |
Safety & Handling
| Hazard | Source | Risk Level | Controls |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPAD damage from ambient light | Room lighting saturates detector | HIGH | Always cap fiber inputs when not in use; dark enclosure during measurements |
| SPAD damage from laser input | Optical power > 1 μW destroys detector | CRITICAL | Always use attenuator before SPAD input; never connect laser directly |
| High voltage (SPAD bias) | Internal bias ~25–75 V (InGaAs SPADs) | LOW | Enclosed module; no user-accessible HV; factory sealed |
| Laser safety (SPDC pump) | 775 nm pump laser (Class 3B/4) | MEDIUM | Laser safety eyewear; enclosed beam path; interlocked enclosure |
| ESD damage | Handling fiber connectors | LOW | ESD wrist strap; proper connector cleaning procedure |